Introduction
In this post, I will discuss limits and
continuity. There are 3 purposes for writing this
post:
- To practise my academic writing.
- To write for fun.
- To expound some points that I was stuck on for a while at first when
I was learning as an undergraduate in my first semester. It may help
someone, or not, because the main purposes actually are 1&2.
I hope you can enjoy the read.
Limits of Sequences
First, I would like to note that all the discussions will be based on
,
and the discussions will not involve metric spaces.
Before we continue, we need to state two axioms.
Axiom 1 (Archimedes’ axiom)
For every
,
there exists
,
such that
.
Axiom 2 (Cantor’s axiom)
and
are two given sequences satisfying
for every
,
with associated intervals
nested and their lengths tending to zero. Then there exists a unique
such that
.
These axioms will be used later.
1.1Definition For every
,
there exists
such that for all
,
.
We write
as
,
or
We call
limit value and we say the limit of sequence
is
or
converges to
Remark. If for every
,
there exists an
such that for all
,
then it means that the sequence
does not converge(it diverges). Furthermore, the sequence diverges to
positive infinity(for every
,
,
we say the sequence diverges to negative infinity). We write:
or
1.2 Theorem If
is convergent, the limit is unique.
Proof. Suppose that there are two different
limit values,
and
.
Since
,
we let
.
By 1.1 Definition, there exists an
,
such that for all
,
and
(taking the larger
if necessary). Then we have
.
This is a contradiction.
□
1.3 Theorem (Squeeze Theorem) Let
,
,
be sequences of real numbers. Suppose that
and
converge to
,
and also suppose that for every
,
we have
.
Then
.
Proof. Since
and
converge to
,
it follows that for every given
,
there exists an
such that for all
,
and
.
Moreover, since for every
,
,
we obtain
.
Hence
.
□
1.4 Theorem
Only the first one will be proved; the others can be exercises for
practice.
Proof. Let
be given. Because
and
are convergent, it follows that for
,
there exists an
such that for all
,
.
is the same: we know there exists an
.
Let
.
It is obvious that for every
,
both
and
are true. Now we estimate:
.
Hence, by 1.1 Definition,
.
□