Limits and Continuity
Introduction
In this post, I will discuss limits and continuity. There are 3 purposes for writing this post:
- To practise my academic writing.
- To write for fun.
- To expound some points that I was stuck on for a while at first when I was learning as an undergraduate in my first semester. It may help someone, or not, because the main purposes actually are 1&2.
I hope you can enjoy the read.
1 Limits of Sequences
First, I would like to note that all the discussions will be based on , and the discussions will not involve metric spaces. Before we continue, we need to state two axioms.
Axiom 1 (Archimedes’ axiom)
For every
,
there exists
,
such that
.
Axiom 2 (Cantor’s axiom)
and
are two given sequences satisfying
for every
,
with associated intervals
nested and their lengths tending to zero. Then there exists a unique
such that
.
These axioms will be used later.
1.1 Definition A sequence in is said to converge if there is a point with the following property: for every , there exists such that for all , . We write as , or
We call limit value and we say the limit of sequence is or converges to
Remark. If for every , there exists an such that for all , then it means that the sequence does not converge(it diverges). Furthermore, the sequence diverges to positive infinity(for every , , we say the sequence diverges to negative infinity). We write:
or
1.2 Theorem If is convergent, the limit is unique.
Proof. Suppose that there are two different limit values, and . Since , we let . By 1.1 Definition, there exists an , such that for all , and (taking the larger if necessary). Then we have . This is a contradiction.
□
1.3 Theorem (Squeeze Theorem) Let , , be sequences of real numbers. Suppose that and converge to , and also suppose that for every , we have . Then .
Proof. Since and converge to , it follows that for every given , there exists an such that for all , and . Moreover, since for every , , we obtain . Hence .
□
1.4 Theorem
Only the first one will be proved; the others can be exercises for practice.
Proof. Let be given. Because and are convergent, it follows that for , there exists an such that for all , . is the same: we know there exists an . Let . It is obvious that for every , both and are true. Now we estimate: . Hence, by 1.1 Definition, .
□
1.5 Definition Let be a subset of . There exists an such that for every , . We say the set is bounded above (has an upper bound), and is an upper bound. Likewise, there exists an such that for every , . We say the set is bounded below (has a lower bound), and is a lower bound. When a set has both an upper bound and a lower bound, it is bounded.
1.6 Theorem






